Monday, March 26, 2012

Diversification Got You Down?

Are you starting to wonder what the heck you got yourself into with the balanced approached you decided to shift to after the last market meltdown?  If so, you are not alone.  Balance and diversification became a hot topic and an easy sale for advisors in 2009 because they were able to point out to investors how much better off they would have been with this approach.  Unfortunately the rearviewmirror does not show what is up ahead.

The S&P 500 Index over the last 3 years, 12 months and YTD has provided a very nice return.  For the first time, in a long time, domestic large cap stocks have taken a leadership position.  Asset classes that throughout the last decade provided diversification and an added boost in return have been lagging the S&P 500.  Foreign market exposure, mostly due to the European debt crisis, has weighted down investor returns within balanced portfolios.  The average performance for gold & precious metals mutual funds over the last twelve months is a return of negative 17.61%.  Yet during the "Lost Decade" (2000-2009) the average performance was a total gain of 512%.  My point?  Many of the asset classes that once helped a portfolio achieve alpha vs. the S&p 500 Index, are currently not providing that extra push.

So what is your next move?  Historical mutual fund inflow/outflow data suggests that investors next move will be to chase the hot return of the S&P 500 Index.  Investing in a manner that will reduce (drive down beta) volatility versus the equity markets, will many times mean that you will lag the equity markets when they are moving steadily higher.  Investors need to start understanding that the upside can come with a downside.

Many retirees own a variation of my 50/50 defensive growth model.  If I were to own that model for myself, which I do not because of my age, then I would want the S&P 500 Index to destroy my performance every single year.  If that is occurring that means everyone is making money, and that is a good thing.  If your 50/50 model is consistantly beating the index, then that will generally mean that the overall markets are not doing very well, ie. The "Lost Decade".  I think my 50/50 defensive growth ETF model is up about 7% over the last 12 months.  That is a rate of return that many find acceptable, and not too bad considering the model trades at about a .5 beta to the S&P 500. 

Raise your hand if your crystal ball works.  Yeah mine doesn't either.  Investors need to understand what they own and why they own it.  What is your portfolio designed to do?  If you can correctly answer that question then you can clearly understand your current returns.  Instead of complaining about asset classes in your models that are holding you back at this time, use rebalancing tools to take advantage of this disparity.  I never abandoned my domestic large cap allocation during the last decade.  Instead I used gains that were locked in via rebalancing, ie. from my gold &precious metals fund, to continue to buy domestic large caps when they were out of favor.  I warned in my book that every advisor was selling gold & precious metals funds to clients based on past returns.  How has that worked out?  If you are constantly shifting to what is hot without a real plan, then there will always be somebody eager to sell you that product.

Stop chasing returns and enjoy the ride. 

Thank you.  Good luck everyone!

Jon R. Orcutt, founder of Allocation For Life, is an asset allocation strategist and author of “Master the Markets with Mutual Funds: A Common Sense Guide To Investing Success”
www.allocationforlife.com

Thursday, March 15, 2012

A Win-Win For Commodities

As you may already know, the growth of the global economy is very important to the success of the companies in the commodities sector.  More often than not, the demand for commodities will increase as living standards increase. Due to this, many economists and analysts believe that the majority of the worldwide growth in demand for commodities will come from developing countries.

Over the last several years there has been a dramatic market shift in developing countries.  China, for example, has shifted to a market system that uses more of the mechanisms of a market economy. This shift has had a significant impact on the commodities sector.  From oil to the most precious commodity of all, water, the increase in demand on the world’s commodity supplies by China has been increasing at an alarming rate.

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global GDP growth is projected to be 4.00% in 2012 and 4.47% in 2013, being led by emerging economies where economic growth is projected to be 6.08% in 2012 and 6.48% in 2013.  The global commodities sector is made up of several different markets including agriculture, metals and mining, clean water supplies, forest and paper products and energy. These commodities are the essential building blocks of every economy in the world.

The USDA reports that global agricultural trade from 2011-2020 is projected to increase due to global economic growth.  This is based on the assumption that the growth rate will rebound to a 3.4% average growth rate for 2011-2020.  Import demands from developing countries are expected to continue to rise because population growth rates in emerging countries remain above those in the rest of the world.

The win-win for commodities could lie in the actions of our own Federal Reserve.  The Fed, over the last three years, has aggressively lowered the federal funds target rate in an attempt to boost the economy.  By doing so, they have also depressed the dollar.  A depressed dollar may encourage investors to continue to shift assets into commodities such as gold, which is historically known for holding value during times of rising inflation (a possible end result to the Feds actions).  I personally believe that economies around the world are improving.  Whether that has to do with our Feds policies or it is just a natural process I do not know, but I do know when economic activity accelerates, whether at home or abroad, the global demand for natural resources increases. The resulting increase in the underlying commodity prices historically generates higher profits for companies in the energy sector and translates into higher returns for investors these securities.

There are many ways to position a portion of your portfolio in commodities.  In my three personal tactical allocation models I like to separate my gold & precious metals investments from my pure broad-based commodities investments.  I try to maintain a weighting between 3.4% and 8.4% in gold & precious metals and a weighting between 3.3% and 8.3% in a broad-basket commodities investment.  Here are some specific product ideas for these two asset classes:

Gold & Precious Metals

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) – If you are looking for a pure play on the price of gold this would be the choice for you.  This ETF is meant to track the performance of the price of gold.

Tocqueville Gold Fund (TGLDX) – I personally own this mutual fund.  I prefer to take a more managed approach to not only investing in gold but all precious metals.  I also like the fact that mining companies, such as Newmont Mining (NME) are owned in a fund like this.  I believe the earnings power of these companies gives a managed fund more power over the long-term versus index like returns that the GLD may provide.  However, there are single years where this can hurt performance, as it did in 2011.

I also believe the Gabelli Gold Fund AAA (GOLDX) is an excellent managed mutual fund choice.

Broad-Basket Commodities

The PowerShares DB Commodity Index ETF (DBC) is a “best bet” choice for many of you.  When you are talking about the vast array of commodities, which span from agriculture to oil to water to forest based products to precious metals, I often feel it is too vast for a manager of a mutual fund to navigate as efficiently as an index.

I personally take a more sophisticated approach with my commodity allocation.  Whenever possible I like to deploy strategies that offer disparity.  I feel it provides me with a better opportunity to take advantage of that disparity and reduced correlation.  For example, I divide my broad-basket commodity allocation evenly between a very conservative approach to owning commodities with a very aggressive approach to owning commodities.  The conservative mutual fund I like to use is the PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy D (PCRDX).  This mutual can often be found holding as much as 50% of the fund in cash and short-term treasury securities.  I counter-balance this approach with the very volatile Direxion Monthly Commodity Bull 2X fund (DXCLX).  This fund seeks to provide 2 times the return of the Morgan Stanley Commodity Related Index.  It does this with the use of leverage which also opens it up to almost 4 times the downside of the index.  Because I stick to a strict quarterly rebalancing schedule I am able to take advantage of the wild prices swings this fund has experienced.  For example, I rebalanced and bought more of the fund at the end of 2011, and the fund is up 14.54% so far in the first quarter of 2012.  If the quarter were ending today then another round of rebalancing would have me reducing my allocation in the Direxion fund, and thus I was able to take advantage of the funds quarterly outperformance.

Both precious metals and broad-basket commodities should have a place in your portfolio.  As with any investment you do not want to go overboard and own too much.  Gold has provided a tremendous hedge against currency risk and if you believe the world economy is improving then you will see pressure increase on the world’s commodity supplies.

Thank you and good luck everyone!

Jon R. Orcutt, founder of Allocation For Life, is an asset allocation strategist and author of “Master the Markets with Mutual Funds: A Common Sense Guide To Investing Success”
www.allocationforlife.com

Monday, March 12, 2012

Chasing Yield? Buyer Beware!

Are you or the advisor that works for you, using bonds to stabilize your portfolio throughout retirement?  That is the ultimate goal.  However, if you think all bonds are created equal then you may get caught on the wrong end of the yield curve.  If this happens then a whole new generation of individual investors will find out that their pretty little asset mix designed to reduce volatility, actually may become very volatile.
The problem I see is the mad rush into long-term bond mutual funds as individual investors are hungry for yield and chasing returns.  The sophisticated investor, I am quite confident, will be able to take advantage of rates at zero and will be smart enough to lock in gains at some point in the future.  However, the majority of individual investors and advisors are not sophisticated, and they are using these types of funds as a long-term solution to provide stability in their asset allocation models.  I suggest they take a look at the not-so-distant past and see how this mix worked out in the “risk off” environment of 2008.
Many individual investors do not understand interest rate risk and the potential negative impact it may have on the bond side of their investment equation.  With interest rates at zero it does not take much insight to realize that at some point, rising interest rates will send long-term bond prices down.  It is just a matter of "when" rather than "if".  This rise in interest rates could come from an explosion in inflation, which is not good for anyone, or from strong economic growth over the next few years.
Understanding what type of bonds you own is essential, especially for retired investors.  When I am designing tactical allocation strategies, I consider the bond side of the equation sacred.  That is the part of the portfolio that I am relying on for price stability and to help drive down the overall beta (risk) of a portfolio when compared to the equity markets.  Investors need to understand that if they own a long-term corporate bond fund or a municipal bond fund, and today are enjoying the higher yield, that these fund managers are mandated to own these types of bonds.  There is very little room to maneuver and these fund managers need to remain fully invested at all times.  You need not look any further than 2008 to see what this could mean for these types of bond funds.  2008 was an example of what we like to call "risk off".  Anything that did not provide a guarantee experienced a vicious downturn.  If you are using an asset allocation mix to provide stability, then it is essential to hire a fixed income manager that takes a "total return" approach.  These types of managers have a tremendous amount of flexibility.  They not only have the ability to move to a large cash position when they see risk on the horizon, but they also have the ability to own any type of fixed income instrument that they feel could provide the highest total return.  Sometimes that means the best total return may be no return versus losing 25% of the portfolio's value.
The fact that interest rates are at zero obviously scares me.  However, the fact that long-term bond prices have been sent artificially higher by the Fed's latest quantitative easing program (QE3) scares me even more.  Due to the fact that interest could not be lowered any further it has led the Fed to come up with new and creative ways to try and stimulate the economy.  The Fed’s newest approach is being referred to as “Operation Twist”.  What is Operation Twist? Basically the Fed can’t reduce short-term interest rates any further because they’re already at zero.  Therefore, the Fed wants to reduce long-term interest rates instead.  They do this by selling short-term bonds and using the proceeds to buy long-term bonds.  When you buy more of something, you raise the price.  When you raise the price of a bond, you lower the interest rate.  So what the Fed is doing is artificially lowering long-term interest rates. 
What will happen to long-term rates when the Fed is done with its easing program?  If QE3 does its job, and the economy continues to improve, then this will be great for equities.  However, it will also allow the Fed to gradually release their stranglehold on interest rates.  Long-term rates will then be allowed to rise, and this will have a negative impact on long-term bond prices.
The other concern economists have with all three of the Fed’s quantitative easing programs is the negative impact that they may have on the US dollar and many believe the programs will send commodity prices higher.  I do not know if they are correct, but we have certainly seen a reaction in oil prices since the announcement of QE3.  If massive inflation is an end result to the easing programs, then the only weapon the Fed has to offset inflation would be to aggressively raise interest rates.  Which would be another negative for long-term bonds.
What other reaction did we see when the Fed announced its QE3 program?  Immediately after the announcement a huge amount of institutional money funneled into Treasury Inflation Protected Bonds (TIPS).  Think about that for a second.  Immediately after the announcement of QE3, the smart money chose to move into a negative yielding TIP, while individual investors moved more into long-term bond funds.
Retired investors must learn to use the bond side of their investment mix as a measure of safety, and should stop chasing yield and capital appreciation without understanding the principal risk they are assuming.  High yielding closed-end funds that use leverage to stabilize their net asset values, and long-term bonds are all facing interest rate risk in the coming years.  If stability is your goal, then you must use a total return approach to owning bonds.
Thank you and good luck everyone!
Jon R. Orcutt, founder of Allocation For Life, is an asset allocation strategist and author of “Master the Markets with Mutual Funds: A Common Sense Guide To Investing Success”
www.allocationforlife.com

*** Added note.  I am aware that Operation Twist is not QE3.  But let's call it what is, and that is manufactured artificial easing.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

February 2012 Sector/Asset Class Performance Data

The following returns represent the category average mutual fund performance for each asset class and sector for the month of February 2012.  Take from it what you will.

                                                                                     Feb                           YTD

Asset Classes
Large Cap Value     
+3.99%+8.41%
Mid Cap Value+4.10%+10.04%
Small Cap Value+2.61%  +9.51%
Foreign Large Cap Value+4.81%+10.74%
Foreign Small/Mid Cap Value+5.93%+14.34%
Large Cap Growth+5.34%+11.95%
Mid Cap Growth+4.99%+12.11%
Small Cap Growth  +4.29%+11.48%
Foreign Large Cap Growth+5.72%+12.55%
Diversified Emerging Markets+5.64% +15.96%
Gold & Precious Metals-1.61%+10.15%
Real Estate-.74%  +5.59%
Commodities Broad Basket+3.33%+7.47%  

Sectors


Technology+6.56%  +15.69%
Consumer Discretionary+5.65%+11.84%
Financials+5.08%+12.86%
Telecommunications & Media+4.16%+6.05%
Industrials+2.97%+12.57%
Utilities+2.23%+.69%
Natural Resources+3.38%+11.45%
Real Estate-.74% +5.59%
Health Care+1.81%+8.75%
Consumer Staples+5.54%  +6.41%
Equity Energy+4.79%+8.82%  


Jon R. Orcutt, founder of Allocation For Life, is an asset allocation strategist and author of “Master the Markets with Mutual Funds: A Common Sense Guide To Investing Success”
www.allocationforlife.com